Crown Life Ins. Co. v. Casteel: Return of the Prodigal SonSummer 2000 – Article
The Appellate Advocate, Vol. XIII, No. 3; (quoted in Harris County v. Smith, 96 S.W.3d 230 (Tex 2002) (O'Neill, J., dissenting))
An exploration of whether Casteel represents an ill-advised revival of the presumed harm doctrine or a justifiable narrowing of the harmless error rule.