Biography
Joe Sullivan has spent more than 25 years defending product liability and mass tort litigation. He concentrates on high-stakes cases involving toxic exposures, including single-plaintiff and multi-plaintiff matters and multidistrict litigation, and has tried and resolved cases in Illinois, Pennsylvania, Texas, Wisconsin, and Michigan.
Joe currently serves as lead counsel in the Hair Relaxer MDL involving allegations that consumer hair straightening products cause or contribute to uterine cancer, and he is also involved in cosmetic talc and artificial stone silicosis litigation. He previously served as national coordinating counsel in the TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation involving hundreds of consolidated lawsuits related to silicone implant injuries, where the Eighth Circuit upheld the doctrine that a supplier of non-defective component parts is not strictly liable for defects in a final product it did not control. His other multidistrict experience includes the San Juan DuPont Plaza Hotel Fire and Asbestos Products Liability proceedings.
Joe's experience also includes longstanding representation of major oil companies in matters involving underground storage tank releases, vapor intrusion, and related EPA and state attorney general proceedings, including a win at the Illinois Supreme Court for an oil company defendant in a UST leak case involving a vapor intrusion explosion at a condominium complex. He has obtained defense verdicts in single and consolidated asbestos trials, and has defended catastrophic injury matters involving amputation, electrocution, and wrongful death. His broader practice extends to construction defect, general liability, employment, transportation, and medical and non-medical professional liability matters.
Representative Matters
- Prevailed on appeal for oil company after an underground gasoline storage tank was leaking and the fuel fumes caused an explosion at a condo complex where Plaintiff resided, resulting in Plaintiff sustaining second-degree burns and other injuries; the Supreme Court upheld the Trial Court and Appellate Court ruling that Plaintiff had a sufficient remedy in law for their injuries, and the Illinois EPA and LUST Program provide governmental enforcement for violations, and ruled in favor of our client.
- Lead counsel for multidistrict litigation Re: Hair Relaxer Litigation involving allegations that consumer product hair straighteners and relaxers cause or contribute to uterine cancers.
- Successfully argued a motion that “a mere possibility of asbestos exposure” is insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment.
- Represented major oil company regarding release of gasoline from an underground storage tank (UST) resulting in litigation involving the EPA and State Attorney General, and claims of property damage and personal injury from explosions and fires resulting from gas vapor intrusion into homes and buildings.
- Defended catastrophic injury case involving double amputation from paper recycling baler.
- Litigated wrongful death case resulting from improper maintenance on a street cleaning truck.
- Defeated subrogation and breach of warranty action involving fires on two tractor trailers.
- Represented insurance broker on negligent failure to bind allegations in personal injury matter.
- Defended case of electrocution with resulting amputation from contact with a utility line while using a rental lift.
- Obtained defense verdict in consolidated asbestos case involving five plaintiffs in one of the first asbestos cases tried in Delaware County, Pennsylvania.
- Won directed defense verdict against first plaintiff in consolidated two-plaintiff case in Philadelphia, and, after two weeks of trial, a defense verdict against the remaining plaintiff.
- Successfully argued a motion to bar the plaintiff’s medical expert testimony in regards to client in Illinois mesothelioma case, resulting in dismissal due to lack of causation evidence.
- Acting as NCC, successfully represented clients in appeal to the Eighth Circuit in MDL product liability matter regarding a medical device; the court upheld the doctrine that an entity supplying a non-defective raw material or a non-defective component part is not strictly liable for defects in the final product over which it had no control.
- In Re: TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation, 97 F. 3d 1050
Education
- Wayne State University Law School (J.D.)
- Michigan State University (B.S.)
Bar Admissions
Courts
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
- U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Professional Affiliations
- Claims and Litigation Management
- Product Liability Committee
- Diversity & Inclusion Committee
- DRI
- Toxic Tort Committee
- Trucking Law Committee
- Diversity Committee
- Medical Professional Liability Association
Honors
- AV Preeminent® Peer Review Rated by Martindale-Hubbell®
- Illinois Super Lawyers (2016-2026)
